Falcao has made the move to A. Madrid for £35 Million plus add-ons for the columbian. The 25-year old transferred with Ruben Micael who went for £4.3 Million. Although was linked with teams like R. Madrid, Chelsea and Inter, he has broken the record for highest transfer fee to a portuguese club with A. Madrid. After what seemed like a horrendous summer do to the departures of De Gea (Manchester United: £18 Million) and Aguero (Manchester City: £38 Million) to England the most wanted striker of Portugal changed it from horrendous to outstanding by signing a 5-year contract with the club.
He got the attention after an outstanding season in which he broke a record for most goals scored in one Europa League/UEFA Cup competition with 18 goals in 16 games. Overall he scored 39 goals in 43 games in the season of 2010/11. Porto had signed him from River Plate in 2009 for a sum believed to be around £5 million, which means they will make a massive profit off the player.
The usual question is if he made the right move? Falcao is an amazing player and is probably making loads of money over there, but if you look at the table of the La Liga from last year you see they were 7th, which means Europa League Play-Offs, stating that Porto has better chances of glory than A. Madrid; so why didn't he at least go to a club which would bring him a step closer to a soccer players dream: Regular Champions League Participant. Even with him they won't get to 3rd place to qualify for thw CL, they didn't make it with Aguero and De Gea either.
Weirdly Falcao did not follow his manager which a lot of players do, so maybe he did not like his old coach Villa-Boas.
Your Yor wrote this post!